Complex issue New policy statement on physician-assisted suicide defeated The AOA HOD voted down the updated proposal after hearing the argument that it went against the osteopathic oath and state laws. July 31, 2018Tuesday The DO Staff Contact The DO Staff Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Topics House of Delegates 2018 Recently, the AOA House of Delegates voted down a proposed policy statement on physician-assisted death. The new policy statement would have retained the AOA’s opposition to the legalization of physician-assisted death, but would have also stated that physicians who help their patients end their lives in states where it is legal shouldn’t be discriminated against. Because the policy statement was disapproved, the AOA’s current policy opposing physician-assisted death and policy on end of life care will remain in place until they sunset in 2022. Osteopathic oath concerns “The primary concern was the wording we used in the task force report, which was physician-assisted death, to talk about the laws that had been passed,” says Anita Showalter, DO, a member of the end of life policy task force, which developed the new policy statement. “The consensus was that physician-assisted death is not compatible with the osteopathic oath.” The AOA’s Public Affairs reference committee, which recommended disapproval, felt that the term physician-assisted suicide should be used rather than physician-assisted death, says Dr. Showalter, who also served on the Public Affairs committee. Additionally, the committee decided that the policy was not consistent across states because the law on physician-assisted suicide is different in many states. “The House and reference committee made a clear statement that we are sticking with the traditional osteopathic values that are reflected in the osteopathic oath,” says Dr. Showalter. “It is the DO’s role to promote the health and wellbeing of a patient to their natural end. We do not see ourselves participating in hastening the death of a patient.” Polarizing issue Physician-assisted suicide is currently legal in seven states and Washington, DC, and another 23 states are considering legislation related to physician-assisted suicide at this time, according to deathwithdignity.org. The topic is polarizing in the medical community. Many DOs share Dr. Showalter’s opinion, and many others, such as anesthesiologist Paul Rein, DO, believe physician-assisted suicide should be legal. “First doing no harm does not necessarily mean you do everything you can to keep the patient’s heart beating,” says Dr. Rein, who practices in Williamsburg, Virginia, where physician-assisted suicide is illegal. “By doing that sometimes, we cause suffering, and suffering is harm.” Further reading: Physician groups revisiting stances on physician-assisted death Physician-assisted death to get a closer look More in Profession Applications open for editorial advisory board member positions with The DO for 2023 The DO is seeking DOs, residents and osteopathic medical students to serve on its volunteer advisory board. What sports medicine fellowship program directors look for in applicants With many years of experience under my belt, I can tell you exactly what will make an applicant stand out when applying for sports medicine fellowship programs. Previous articleAOA settles class-action lawsuit Next articleAOA President William S. Mayo, DO: 'Go forward with confidence and embrace change.'