The cost of convenience

Peace of mind or prescription risk? A DO weighs in on at-home antibiotic kits

“Peace of mind in a box” may sound appealing, but infectious disease expert Vitaliy Krol, DO, explains why at-home antibiotic kits pose serious risks.

Emergency medical kits are now providing the public with easy access to antibiotics. Just how dangerous is this development?

Many companies are offering medical kits to treat emergencies without a doctor’s direct supervision. These kits are marketed as “peace of mind in a box.” These products are touted as panacea—and a proactive resource for individuals and families. One kit even includes eight different antimicrobial agents and is advertised as including treatments for ailments ranging from sexually transmitted infections to bioterrorism.

It’s helpful for physicians to be aware of this new product as their patients may be purchasing and using these kits, and they also may ask questions about them. Although selling prescription antibiotics without a prescription is illegal in the U.S., some kit sellers are getting around this by connecting buyers with a doctor who then provides prescriptions for all of the prescription meds included in the kit.

‘Shooting from the hip’

To explore the medical and ethical implications of unsupervised antibiotic use, we spoke with Vitaliy Krol, DO, a board-certified infectious disease specialist based in Long Island, New York.

Editor’s note: Dr. Krol is article author Gary Krol’s father.

When first asked about these products, Dr. Krol admitted that, prior to this interview, he was not aware that emergency antibiotic kits were being sold to the public. After reviewing the intended purpose and contents of the product, he expressed serious concern.

“As an osteopathic internal medicine physician with a specialty in infectious disease, I diagnose problems and treat with specificity,” Dr. Krol said. “Many infections don’t require antibiotics at all, and using a kit like this encourages treatment without a diagnosis or physical examination. That’s not how we’re taught to practice medicine … it’s essentially shooting from the hip.”

Dr. Krol referenced Sir Alexander Fleming, MBBS, the Scottish physician and microbiologist who discovered penicillin and once warned against the dangers of antibiotic misuse.

“Dr. Fleming cautioned that using penicillin on someone who doesn’t truly need it could lead to antibiotic resistance, and he believed the prescriber would be morally responsible for that patient’s decline due to multi-drug-resistant bacteria,” said Dr. Krol.

Antibiotic resistance remains one of the most pressing global health threats. According to Dr. Krol, improper antibiotic use accelerates this process.

“I don’t think this product is a good idea,” he said plainly.

Potential major risks

When asked whether there could be any legitimate use for such a kit, Dr. Krol acknowledged a few very specific scenarios.

“If you’re deep in the wilderness, hours away from help, and you find a tick embedded in your skin, having doxycycline could be beneficial. If you’re traveling abroad and are bitten by an animal, these medications might help prevent infection. They could even be useful in rare cases of bioterrorism exposure. But these are rare and highly specific cases,” Dr. Krol explained.

Despite those limited scenarios, Dr. Krol warned that the risks of misuse far outweigh the benefits for most individuals: “Primary care physicians should be extremely cautious when advising patients about buying kits like this.”

Dr. Krol noted the potential of antibiotic-induced infections, including fungal infections and Clostridium difficile (C. diff) infection. Additionally, Dr. Krol explained that inappropriate antibiotic use can complicate future diagnostic testing for infections such as endocarditis and other serious maladies. 

“If someone takes antibiotics without a proper workup, it may interfere with culture results and mask the true underlying condition,” Dr. Krol said, further explaining that the correct treatment may be delayed, resulting in worsening infection, sepsis or death.

High price, low value

Dr. Krol explained that the actual value of the contents of these kits is likely between $25 and $40, much less than the $300 price tag of the kit. Most patients with health insurance can see a well-trained primary care physician and get appropriate screening and medication for much less than $300.   

“Antibiotics should only be taken after consulting with a primary care provider or specialist, following a proper physical exam and diagnostic testing,” he said.

Individualized preparedness

While the idea of being prepared for the unexpected is understandable, Dr. Krol ultimately feels that self-prescribing medications without medical oversight is not just unwise, it’s potentially dangerous. When it comes to staying ready for potential infections, he notes that there’s no one-size-fits-all approach.

Each individual’s risk depends on factors such as lifestyle, travel habits, immune status and even occupation or hobbies. For example, someone who travels internationally, works closely with animals or has a compromised immune system may face different risks than someone exposed primarily to local pathogens. Because of this, Dr. Krol emphasizes the importance of a personalized plan developed with a healthcare provider, based on a thorough medical, social and travel history.

Dr. Krol concluded, “The convenience of an emergency kit must not come at the expense of responsible medical care.”

Editor’s note: The views expressed in this article are the subject’s own and do not necessarily represent the views of The DO or the AOA.

Related reading:

A prescription for partnership: How a DO and an MD are running a concierge medicine practice together

The language of care: Resources for treating patients with limited English proficiency

3 comments

  1. Herbert Dempsey DO

    I agree with Dr Krol wholeheartedly!
    I just saw this advertised and could not believe it was available to the public.

  2. Bruce Weaver DO

    I couldn’t agree more regarding your conclusion statement. The genernal public is not aware of any antibiograms in any area, much less its contents. Drug resistance has become a major problem, not only in this country, but all over the world. I believe this to be because of the antibiotic availability OTC in many countries to the South of us, in particular Mexico. Hence the MDRO E Coli outbreaks in certain produce crops that come across the border from time to time. Using the right antibiotic, when it is actually needed, for the right patient, given the right diagnosis is key to reducing the incidence of this resistance.

    That being said, I still see providers prescribing Cipro for known MRSA. I remember Robbins Pathologic Basis of Disease from Med School, and there were always quite of few that struggled with matching the right antibiotic for the right infection. Whenever I have a resident or med student, I do my best to get them up to speed on this, and encourage other providers to do the same.

    This has already been too much, but this went without saying the obvious about side effects, allergies, and overall provider availability and cost. To close, this is likely going to hurt people directly and indirectly, and is a terrible plan that is not worth the small cost savings of “skipping the provider.”

  3. GL

    There is a TV commercial that advertises this kit. I was quite astonished the first time I saw it. Didn’t understand how a physician could lack stewardship of antibiotic use to this degree. He’s a TV Doc that does the talk show circuit, now exploiting patients for cash. Wondered how he gets away doing it without a prescription or evaluation, if not illegal, definitively lacks moral fortitude. Patients will naturally overprescribe to themselves, that’s the way of our society. The one quote on the commercial was, ‘now with cold and flu season arriving, this antibiotic kit is exactly what you need’, an oxymoron if I ever heard one. Kind of wondering why the FDA or another government agency hasn’t shut this practice down. The risk/benefit of this practice favors greed only.

Leave a comment Please see our comment policy