Mental health Beyond the Confines of the DSM V The DSM V shows us what is “wrong” with patients, and it can limit our understanding of and compassion for those who have truly endured significant challenges. Aug. 1, 2022MondayAugust 2022 issue Art of Medicine Stephanie Lee, DO, MS Stephanie Lee, DO, MS, is a psychiatry resident at Good Samaritan Regional Medical Center in Corvallis, Oregon. Contact Dr. Lee
The gift of time: Reflecting on caring for patients who have cancer Stephanie Lee, DO, MS, shares a thought-provoking conversation that made her think differently about life, time and the present moment.
How an integrated care program can improve health care outcomes and reduce costs David M. Smith, DO, shares how his integrated care program in Melbourne, Florida, has reduced its patients’ ED visits, hospitalizations and readmissions.
The DSM is not meant to to be confining; I’m sorry you feel that way. The DSM establishes a set of clinical criteria necessary to make a psychiatric diagnosis. Because treatment stems from diagnosis — not vice versa — you remain free to use your creativity and ingenuity in therapy and apply the art (and heart) of medicine to your patients. Medical textbooks do not breathe life into patients. That becomes your job once armed with medical knowledge. Aug. 15, 2022, at 10:52 am Reply
I applaud both your insight and observations. The DSM 5-tr is not a text, not all inclusive and certainly not complete. It is a manual designed to provide the ability to allow discourse between multiple professions engaged in the treatment of patients. There certainly are those who rigorously adhere to the published symptom descriptions to make a diagnosis. They are not wrong, but certainly may miss nuances of the patient’s presentation leading to less than optimal intervention. I encourage you to continue to develop your skills of observation. I also most whole heartedly suggest that you engage in the study of transference. This will allow you to more fully understand the effect of patient interactions with you. Continue learning and continue your exploration of the human psyche. Docere, indeed. Aug. 18, 2022, at 10:30 am Reply
I will recommend you see the DSM, as the other methods of classifying diseases/disorders. Is no different than ICD, were history, signs, and symptoms are described to help you make a specific Hearth diagnosis, so you can develop a treatment program to help them. Their emotions, family, personalities also affect treatment of their Hearth Disease. So you adjust. Unfortunately we are still carrying the Stigma of Psychiatric disorders been the fault of family, personality ,or emotions. While it may play a larger role, we need to focus on the disorder/ Syndrome, if we are to help them.you need to combine both, and not vs. the other. Your sensitivity will help you much, just don’t forget the science. Aug. 21, 2022, at 6:46 pm Reply
Hello everyone, thank you for your comments. I believe there is value in seeing both the diagnosis and the person behind the diagnosis. My focus in this piece was mainly to focus on the patient and his story, and not invalidate the DSM-V. The DSM-V has historically been fruitful in speaking about the diagnosis and how to help patients in their journey. It’s important to have balance as we meet people where they are. Although I focused more on the person in this piece, I also want to highlight that there are multiple dimensions of understanding mental health. As someone who has been through my own healing and I continue to do so each day, I have learned to appreciate multiple viewpoints in mental health and have been grateful to have experienced the sensitivity and kindness in others, as well as the scientific background underlying the overall care. I hope this clarifies any confusion. Best, Stephanie Aug. 25, 2022, at 10:06 am Reply
Stephanie, thank you so much for sharing this. It reminds me of of being back in my pediatric rotation when I was in medical school. Many of my patients and family have also experienced similar struggles with their mental health. I’ve seen some of my closest family members struggle with being boxed into a diagnosis and facing judgement because of that. A lot of them tell me it’s difficult to break free from the stereotypes of certain psychiatric diagnoses. When I read about Lucas, it reminds me of how environmental factors can really affect the health outcome of some of these patients. I think medicine is an all-encompassing craft, and I agree with you when you say mental health is multi dimensional. I also think it takes a lot of growth and self-reflection to write a piece such as this. I stay in support of your work! Aug. 26, 2022, at 3:44 pm Reply
Fresh Perspective, I wish people spoke about this more it helps me understand a different viewpoint. It is important to help patients through a case-by-case basis. Often DSM and ICD coding do not always match the patient presentation. I appreciate the acknowledgement of other factors that contribute to the patient presentation. Aug. 28, 2022, at 4:21 pm Reply
I sure hope you consider psychiatry as a possible path because you already possess what most of us psychiatrists believe is very important, a philosophical thought process. Your point is well taken and the reason why I emphasize the “Always rule out, Never rule in” rule when teaching 1st, 2nd year residents. DSM-V and its predecessors are guidebooks, not rulebooks. They provide a foundation for homing in on the diagnosis that can help create an evidence-based treatment plan. The specific diagnosis is also necessary to provide access to care for the those struggling. But that is another discussion for another day. Best of luck inyour journey. Nov. 20, 2022, at 6:24 am Reply